Tuesday, July 10, 2007

Thoughts On
Interpol: Our Love to Admire

"Admiration is a very short-lived passion that immediately decays upon growing familiar with its object, unless it be still fed with fresh discoveries, and kept alive by a new perpetual succession of miracles rising up to its view."

-Joseph Addison


One aspect of rock music that's often overlooked is that some of the most memorable groups have something distinctly awkward about them, be it the melodies, the arrangements, or the overall songwriting style. The converse is also usually true: if a band is too polished or lacks spontaneity, one should be suspicious.

By this Libertines fan's own admission, Arctic Monkeys have made better 'Libertines' music than The Libertines ever did. Morrissey has made more perfect 'Smiths' music solo than he ever did with Johnny Marr. Not to be outdone, Coldplay and Muse have sanded off the rough edges of Radiohead and Jeff Buckley into an easily accessible musical product.

In the past few years, we've seen Interpol's formula "Edited" into the blueprint for a host of other groups. These sort of rock simulacra are of course built into the system, with the majors and indies trotting out countless imitators in the off-years between albums by the Radioheads, Oasises, and Interpols of the world.

So what's a band like Interpol to do when so many of their contemporaries have stolen from their playbook? There's the Oasis model: confronted with groups like Cast, Hurricane #1, and Ocean Colour Scene, they simply put their head down and trudged ahead making 'Oasis' music. Then there's the Radiohead model: go off on a wild tangent that leaves other groups (and many fans) scratching their heads. Interpol have chosen the Oasis route, and to be sure, there is some fine 'Interpol' music on this record. After verging on self-parody for much of "Antics", Paul Banks and co. would seem to be back on track.

"No I in Threesome"'s expansive chorus evokes the sort of sun-drenched despair that one might find in a Bret Easton Ellis novel. "The Heinrich Maneuver", the album's first single, is punctuated by Banks's dramatic guitar stabs and Sam Fogarino's military-like precision on the drums. Lyrically, Banks has moved away from the pole-dancing-of-the-stars absurdity of "Slow Hands": the chorus's refrain of "today my heart swings" exudes the sort of easy cool he achieved consistently throughout "Turn on the Bright Lights".

"Pace is the Trick" is simple and all the better for it. Built around a circular, arpeggiated guitar figure, the song unexpectedly bursts into one of the strongest choruses ever found on an Interpol record. "Pioneer to the Falls", meanwhile, offers incontrovertible proof of the band having developed its palette (on this one song, at least). Built around a haunting piano figure and including what sounds like a melodica, it has the sort of widescreen melancholy one wishes had made up the whole record.

While the rise of the Internet and music blogs has had the inarguably beneficial effect of exposing eccentric acts to a wider audience, it has also enabled a troubling synchronization of opinion. A quick tour of the blogosphere reveals a flurry of sycophantic posts and a disturbing lack of dissenting views. The band of the moment becomes infallible, bathed in the warm glow of breathless hyperbole, just as those who say otherwise are ridiculed.

So at the risk of subjecting myself to further bullying by internet taste makers, I'll say that "Our Love to Admire" just ain't good enough. Listen to modern third records like "OK Computer" or "Urban Hymns", landmark achievements striking for their depth and ambition, and "Admire" seems like a bit of a cop-out. It offers no sustained musical progression: on most of the songs, the band play it safe; when they try to strike out into uncharted territory, they usually do it unsuccessfully.

The intricate "Mammoth" is like a finely crafted piece of origami, impressive in its complexity, yet ultimately hollow. "Rest my Chemistry" and "The Scale" are uneventful retreads of songs done better on "Turn on the Bright Lights". "Wrecking Ball" tries to incorporate compelling elements like a brass section, minimalist drums, and multi-tracked vocals, but the end result is a musical mess. This sort of failed experiment is why God created b-sides; for Interpol, a band never known for its prolificacy, it has become a crucial album cut.

Make no mistake, this album will probably do quite well. Capitol is no doubt betting that there are enough people not familiar enough with Interpol's debut to be truly excited about "Our Love to Admire". But for this listener, who's been watching the group since their unsigned days in NYC, there's something deeply unsatisfying about this record. One can only hope this a case of course correction, rather than a sign of what's to come.

Rating: 6 out of 10

Labels: , ,

    Dead Flowers: Anglophiles Anonymous

12 Comments:

Blogger Kate said...

Morrissey better than the Smiths? you're joking....right? Seriously though, with your lists and such I was sitting there going no...no... he doesn't think Our Love To Admire is the best thing Interpol's ever done? he can't! and then you don't, so big sigh of relief. (I need some coffee)

8:28 AM  
Blogger Mike said...

no no no...morrissey not better than the smiths, just more polished, if you get my drift.

10:26 AM  
Blogger Nadirt said...

How predictable. Wait till Pitchfork shits out it's snobbery, then follow suit to up credability. Very transparent

10:45 AM  
Blogger Mike said...

uh no...1) i don't read pitchfork and 2) i started writing this review a week ago and 3)I posted it early this morning--the same time pitchfork did. I would imagine that is because this is the day it comes out, jackass.

12:08 PM  
Blogger Nadirt said...

You're right, my bad. I got a little fiery off their review didn't mean to judge your opinion. I just can't believe some of these mediocre reviews, I think this album might be as good if not better than Antics, and head and shoulders above a festival of shite being released this year... I'm a faithful Interpol fan, and other really good bands too, it's just a great album with a bunch of things worthy of exploration and some truely Interpol-esce songs. So what if they haven't altered their sound, why is that a bad thing? It's a sound that really works, is theirs alone, and has lasting power.

1:49 PM  
Blogger Mike said...

No worries...for someone who doesn't read Pitchfork and has never, frankly, seen them as an authority on indie music, your comment came as a bit of a shock. Especially because the bulk of this review was written before the weekend. Looking at the PFM review, there are a few similar elements, but I can assure you that's pure coincidence.

4:24 PM  
Blogger Kate said...

Honestly, I think very few bloggers read pitchfork's reviews...

5:13 PM  
Blogger F.J. Delgado said...

Ecellent review, but I think you might have expected a little too much from Interpol on this record. Perhaps you were expecting great things based on potential, but I believe their new album is a solid addition to their catalogue.

Just because Radiohead made OK Computer with their third record doesn't mean Interpol has to. However, you make a lot of great obsevations about the band, and I respect your opinion. Keep up the great work!

2:05 AM  
Blogger Mike said...

Thanks f.j.--point taken. As you can probably tell from the review, I see Interpol as one of the better bands of this era, so maybe I was expecting too much.

That being said, they're not a tiny indie band anymore, so I'd say a lot of people were expecting them to 'break out' on this album. Ah well--maybe next one.

5:20 AM  
Blogger kellarizz said...

first up, i think you run a great blog. just saying.

i think i was quite the opposite to you with Our Love To Admire. Interpol is one of my favourite bands, and Turn On The Bright Lights is one of my favourite albums, but I had begun to lose faith in Interpol in the lead up to this release. I thought they would release another above average record, similar to Antics, but absolutely nthing compared to Bright Lights, so i was pleasantly surprised by Our Love To Admire. i don't think it lives up to Bright Lights but i do think it's terrible to constantly compare bands to previous efforts (ie. Arcade Fire) as you lose sight of the great record in front of you.

anyway, i think you make a good point in you review (and i loved the origami metaphor), but i don't exactly agree with your opinion.

4:50 AM  
Blogger Mike said...

Thanks Kellarizz...glad you like the blog. I think you bring up some good points, but at the same time, I can't help looking at the big picture. An example: I literally played 'PDA' to death. It used to send shivers down my spine. Now it's probably my own fault, but a song similar to that just won't have the same effect anymore.

Now the new b-side 'Mind Over Time', on the other hand, blew me away. Had they put together an album like that, I would have been more than willing to dish out an 8 or a 9.

5:55 AM  
Blogger kellarizz said...

i personally don't hear much material being reused on Our Love, maybe i'm just being naive, but it seems pretty fresh to me. i'm pretty hopeful for the future of interpol, because to me it seems like they made an awesome record, then tried to replicate that with Antics and just couldn't do it, and have tried some new things with Our Love and it is beginning to pay off. I'm looking forward to great things.

i haven't heard 'mind over time', but i'll be sure to check it out.

9:49 AM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home